Country
Headquarters
Germany
Sector
Performance band
F
Total Score
11
Organisation Score
0
Relationship Score
24
Engagement Intensity
0
1
Theme 1 - Human rights due diligence
Businesses identify, assess, prevent, and address human rights risks within their operations and supply chains
0
Theme score
Q1.1
Legal DD as requirement
0
Q1.2
Legal DD for all companies
-
Q1.3
Enforcement mechanism
-
Q1.4
Directors and company duties
-
By Legislation
Omnibus
Not Supporting
Evidence for Q1.1
Making human rights due diligence a legal requirement for companies including systems to identify, assess, mitigate or manage human rights risks and impacts to improve that process over time and to disclose the risks and impacts, the steps taken and the results.
Evian Letter
(Legislation: Omnibus)
Legal DD as requirement
Score
-2
Region
EU
Year
2025
Data Source
Media Reports
Here we search in a consistent manner (the organization name and relevant query search terms) a set of web sites of representing reputable news or data aggregations. Supported by targeted searches of proprietary databases.
Social LobbyMap Comment
This joint statement signed by the CEOs of TotalEnergies SE and Siemens AG calls for the abolition of the CSDDD.
Extract from Source
"CEOs call for the full abolishment of CS3D as a clear and symbolic signal to European and international companies that the governments and the Commission are really engaged to restore competitiveness in Europe."
2
Theme 2 - Remedy
Ensures companies provide remediation for human rights harms and access to justice for victims.
-
Theme score
Q2.1
Provide remedy
-
Q2.2
Apply leverage
-
Q2.3
Grievance mechanism
-
Q2.4
Right-holders consultation
-
Q2.5
Judicial enforcement with liability
-
Q2.6
Remove geographical limitations
-
No Evidence
3
Theme 3 - Supply chain human rights due diligence
Monitors human rights risks across the entire value chain, including suppliers and contractors.
-
Theme score
Q3.1
Whole value chain coverage
-
Q3.2
Risk based approach to actions taken
-
Q3.3
HR in contract clauses and supplier CoC
-
No Evidence
4
Theme 4 - Stakeholder engagement
Involves stakeholders in decision-making and human rights risk management processes.
-
Theme score
Q4.1
Identify stakeholders and their interests
-
Q4.2
Engagement channel
-
Q4.3
Consult stakeholders on HR risk assessment
-
Q4.4
Consult stakeholders on action plans
-
Q4.5
Long-term HR risk management
-
No Evidence
Positions by legislation
Social LobbyMap analyses the lobbying positions of companies and trade associations across a universe of different legislations on social issues. Detailed scores are calculated as aggregates of all legislations covered for a given entity. To allow for a more nuanced view of the positions entities have taken on the specific legislations, the table below gives an overview of whether the entity has been supportive, mixed/neutral, or unsupportive of a legislation.
| Legislation | Position |
|---|---|
| Omnibus | Not Supporting |
Relationship Score
The Relationship Score (expressed as a percentage score from 0 to 100) is an aggregate assessment of how supportive or obstructive the company's industry associations are towards Human Rights policies aligned with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, with 0 being fully opposed and 100 being fully supportive.
| Trade Association | Performance band |
|---|---|
| DIGITALEUROPE | D- |
| econsense | E- |
| Eurelectric | E- |
| BUSINESSEUROPE | F |
| Confederation of Danish Industry | F |
| Federation of German Businesses (BDI) | F |
Disclaimer
All information presented on this platform is based on publicly available data and third-party sources. While we strive for accuracy, the content may not reflect the full scope of a company's activities or positions. This profile is not an endorsement or accusation. For corrections or inquiries, please contact us. For the full disclaimer, click here