Orsted

Country

Denmark

Headquarters

Denmark

Sector

Energy

Total Score

Relationship Score

Disclaimer All information presented on this platform is based on publicly available data and third-party sources. While we strive for accuracy, the content may not reflect the full scope of a company's activities or positions. This profile is not an endorsement or accusation. For corrections or inquiries, please contact us. For the full disclaimer, click here

Theme 1 - Human rights due diligence

See Evidence

Businesses identify, assess, prevent, and address human rights risks within their operations and supply chains

Theme 1 Score

Q1.1 - Legal DD as requirement

Q1.2 - Legal DD for all companies

Q1.3 - Enforcement mechanism

Q1.4 - Directors and company duties

Evidence for Q1.1

Making human rights due diligence a legal requirement for companies including systems to identify, assess, mitigate or manage human rights risks and impacts to improve that process over time and to disclose the risks and impacts, the steps taken and the results.

Business statement on the CSDDD 22/05/24

Legal DD as requirement

Score 1

Region

Year

2024

External Link

Data Source 5

Media Reports

Here we search in a consistent manner (the organization name and relevant query search terms) a set of web sites of representing reputable news or data aggregations. Supported by targeted searches of proprietary databases.

Social LobbyMap Comment:

The entities welcome the directive and urge EU legislators to do support it

Extract from Source

The statement includes that following '“The CSDDD is substantially aligned with the international standards on Responsible Business Conduct. This makes it credible and its implementation manageable.” “At the same time, it is ground-breaking as it makes due diligence mandatory for companies that are in scope across the EU.” “We support the CSDDD and call on European decision-makers to do so as well.'

Theme 2 - Remedy

See Evidence

Ensures companies provide remediation for human rights harms and access to justice for victims.

Theme 2 Score

Q2.1 - Provide remedy

Q2.2 - Apply leverage

Q2.3 - Grievance mechanism

Q2.4 - Right-holders consultation

Q2.5 - Judicial enforcement with liability

Q2.6 - Remove geographical limitations

Theme 3 - Supply chain human rights due diligence

See Evidence

Monitors human rights risks across the entire value chain, including suppliers and contractors.

Theme 3 Score

Q3.1 - Whole value chain coverage

Q3.2 - Risk based approach to actions taken

Q3.3 - HR in contract clauses and supplier CoC

Theme 4 - Stakeholder engagement

See Evidence

Involves stakeholders in decision-making and human rights risk management processes.

Theme 4 Score

Q4.1 - Identify stakeholders and their interests

Q4.2 - Engagement channel

Q4.3 - Consult stakeholders on HR risk assessment

Q4.4 - Consult stakeholders on action plans

Q4.5 - Long-term HR risk management

Q4.6 - Stakeholder interests in corporate decisions

Legislation	Phase of Active Company Engagement	Position

There are no legislations linked to this organisation

Relationship Score

The Relationship Score (expressed as a percentage score from 0 to 100) is an aggregate assessment of how supportive or obstructive the company's industry associations are towards Human Rights policies aligned with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, with 0 being fully opposed and 100 being fully supportive.

Industry Association	Performance band
Confederation of Danish Industry	F